• OpenEEmeter Methods
    • OpenEEmeter Process
    • OpenEEmeter Compliance
    • Project Updates
    • Technical Working Group >
      • Technical Appendix
      • Issues and Evidence
    • OpenEEmeter History
    • Stakeholders
  • LFE OpenEEmeter
    • OpenEEmeter Overview
    • Github Code
    • EEweather
    • Documentation
  • FLEXmeter
    • GRIDmeter
    • Energy Differential Privacy
  • Contact
OpenEEmeter
  • OpenEEmeter Methods
    • OpenEEmeter Process
    • OpenEEmeter Compliance
    • Project Updates
    • Technical Working Group >
      • Technical Appendix
      • Issues and Evidence
    • OpenEEmeter History
    • Stakeholders
  • LFE OpenEEmeter
    • OpenEEmeter Overview
    • Github Code
    • EEweather
    • Documentation
  • FLEXmeter
    • GRIDmeter
    • Energy Differential Privacy
  • Contact

OpenEEmeter Technical Working Group Meeting Summary | July 2, 2024

7/4/2024

0 Comments

 
Thanks to everyone who joined the most recent OpenEEmeter technical working group meeting.

In this meeting, the team proposed a new naming convention, in which the name there would be an umbrella term that would encompass EEmeter, EEweather, and OpenEEmeter as submodules, along with the Recurve project GRIDmeter, which would be donated to LFEnergy. 

The advantage of this approach is that it would allow much more flexibility in the future to add additional features to the library, without making the library focused entirely around AMI meter-bases savings. It would also reduce duplicative work in updating functions that exist in more than one place. 

After a recap of recent working group meetings, the discussion moved to the a discussion of recent work on interpolation, including changing the method to autocorrelation interpolation. 

The conversation moved toward a discussion of population-level results, which has improved over the previous model, as well as bias in the model and approaches to fix it. The preferred approach to fixing this is through binning by temperature, but there second option of linearizing the temperature response, which is not well conceived yet, but would require multiple fits.

Next steps include fixing temperature bias (including determining if binning is sufficient or linearization is necessary updating the objective function to include PNMBE, and reoptimizing hyperparameters) and moving the hourly model fully into the OpenEEmeter. 

Watch the full discussion below. ​​
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

      Sign Up for Technical Working Group Updates

    Subscribe to Newsletter
    The purpose of this blog is to provide a high-level overview of CalTrack  progress.
    ​
    For a deeper understanding or to provide input on technical aspects of CalTrack, refer to the GitHub issues page (
    https://github.com/CalTRACK-2/caltrack/issues). 
    Recordings
    2019 CalTRACK Kick Off:

    CalTRACK 2.0 
    July 19, 2018
    June 28, 2018
    June 7, 2018
    May 24, 2018
    May 3, 2018
    April 12, 2018
    March 29, 2018
    March 15, 2018
    March 1, 2018
    ​
    February 15, 2018
    February 1, 2018

    Archives

    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    July 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • OpenEEmeter Methods
    • OpenEEmeter Process
    • OpenEEmeter Compliance
    • Project Updates
    • Technical Working Group >
      • Technical Appendix
      • Issues and Evidence
    • OpenEEmeter History
    • Stakeholders
  • LFE OpenEEmeter
    • OpenEEmeter Overview
    • Github Code
    • EEweather
    • Documentation
  • FLEXmeter
    • GRIDmeter
    • Energy Differential Privacy
  • Contact